Question

In the fictional Stolen Valor Act case of US v. Fields, the prosecution argued that Fields’s lie was intentional. protected by free speech. damaging to soldiers. unintentional.

Answer 1

In the fictional Stolen Valor Act case of US v. Fields, the prosecution argued that Fields’s lie was Protected by free speech.

For better understanding let's explain what Free speech means

• Freedom of speech is a common and world known principle that was passed by government and which gives room for people or a community to voice out their opinions and ideas without fear, any legal sanction or payback

• Fields’s lie was Protected by free speech so he can say what he likes

from the above we can therefore say that the answer In the fictional Stolen Valor Act case of US v. Fields, the prosecution argued that Fields’s lie was Protected by free speech, is correct

Learn more about the  US v. Fields from:

https://brainly.com/question/11417002

Answer 2

Answer:

simply the answer is b or proected by freedom of speech

Explanation: