Question

The Washington Monument has stood firmly in place, in Philadelphia, since it was completed in 1884. Because it has stood for well over 100 years, we can conclude that the monument will still be standing throughout the twenty-first century.
Argument A is strong or weak?
Has all true premises or does not have?
Therefore, Argument A is cogent or not cogent?

Answer 1

Given that The Washington Monument has stood firmly in place in Philadelphia since its completion in 1884, It can be concluded that

• The Argument is strong
• It has all true premises
• Argument A is cogent

The Argument is strong because there is logical reason behind the argument which is the fact that the Washington Monument has actually stood for more than 100 years which is equivalent to a century ( period of the 21st century ).

The premises behind the argument are all true because they provide a valid basis for the argument been made. ( i.e. the monument standing in place since it was completed ).

Given that the Argument is strong and all the premises are true, the argument can be said to be cogent .

Hence, we can conclude that the Argument is strong, has true premises and also that the argument is cogent.

Learn more : https://brainly.com/question/13445406