Please help! Q: How might Laura Collins Lyster- Mensh respond to “Brutus’” statements on natural rights? Answer in a minimum of three complete sentences using supporting evidence from the lesson.
Passage:If we may collect the sentiments of the people of America, from their own most solemn declarations, they hold this truth as self-evident, that all men are by nature free. No one man, therefore, or any class of men, have a right, by the law of nature, or of God, to assume or exercise authority over their fellows … How great a proportion of natural freedom is necessary to be yielded by individuals, when they submit to government, I shall not inquire. So much, however, must be given, as will be sufficient to enable those to whom the administration of the government is committed, to establish laws for the promoting the happiness of the community, and to carry those laws into effect. But it is not necessary, for this purpose, that individuals should relinquish all their natural rights. Some are of such a nature that they cannot be surrendered. Of this kind are the rights of conscience, the right of enjoying and defending life, etc. Others are not necessary to be resigned in order to attain the end for which government is instituted; these therefore ought not to be given up. To surrender them, would counteract the very end of government, to wit, the common good. From these observations it appears, that in forming a government on its true principles, the foundation should be laid in the manner I before stated, by expressly reserving to the people such of their essential rights as are not necessary to be parted with.

Respuesta :

Answer:

Laura Collins Lister-Mensch might respond to Brutus's normal rights language by arguing that common rights are not rights at all because they come from man and not from God. Huckabee would then go on to argue that the fundamental rights that humanity has are simply those that God created, and that those rights are not inalienable, but that you need to get your rights as a man. Brutus declares that the general rights that the entire population of America has shouldnot be denied on the grounds that these rights that we have are fundamental and pointless, but Huckabee does not see this in this sense.

(iammallika)

Explanation:

Hope it will help you!!!

The way Laura Collins responded to Brutus' assertion regarding the natural rights would be as follows:

Laura Collins Lyster

Laura can argue the point that no individual possesses the authority to dominate or control others' freedom.

This is substantiated through her statement that "All men are by nature free."

She states that controlling the freedom of any man by anyone is not justified in any case("by law...nature...God").

This implies that these are fundamental and inalienable rights and must not be refuted in any circumstance.

Learn more about "Natural Rights" here:

brainly.com/question/16919777

ACCESS MORE
EDU ACCESS