Respuesta :
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
In general terms, an nth degree polynomial has n zeros, for example, a first-degree polynomial (a line) has 1 zero. Then a third-degree polynomial function has 3 zeros, as Kelsey said. But Ray said the function has 4 intercepts, which are the 3 zeros (interceptions with the x-axis) and the y-intercept (every polynomial has 1 y-intercept), so he is also correct.
Zeros are interception of curve on x-axis, or input axis. The solutions to the sub parts are:
- No, Ray and Kelsey cannot be correct together, as three degree polynomial can have at max three intercepts.
- Part A: The considered function is g(x) = (x + 2)(x − 1)(x − 2) . It rises from bottom left to top right on its ends. Its zeros are x = -2, x = 1, and x = 2. It's y-intercept is at y = 4
- Part B: The y-intercept of the parabola is on . Its zeros are x = 1, x = 2. It's y-intercept is at y = 2
How to find zeros and y-intercept of a function?
- Zeros or x-intercepts =Intersection points of the considered function's curve on input axis(usually represented by values of x)
- y-intercept = Intersection points of the considered function's curve on output axis
- On x-axis, value of y-coordinate is 0,
- On y-axis, value of x-coordinate is 0.
Thus, if function is [tex]y = f(x)[/tex] then putting y = 0 gives zeros of the function.
And putting x = 0 gives the y-intercept of the function. (if any, for both cases).
How many zeros are possible for n order polynomial?
At max n distinct real zeros are possible for n order polynomial. It is "at max" since sometimes, some or all zeros may be imaginary, or sometimes some or all zeros may be same (not distinct) (although for not same cases too, we can count them different).
Thus, No, Ray and Kelsey cannot be correct together, as three degree polynomial can have at max three intercepts. (assuming intercept is denoting x-intercepts here)
Part A: Let we choose the function g(x) = (x + 2)(x − 1)(x − 2)
For end behaviors, we have to analyse output of polynomial as x becomes arbitrarily large or small. Taking limits, we get:
[tex]lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}(g(x) = (x + 2)(x - 1)(x - 2)) \implies g(x) \rightarrow \infty\\\\lim_{x\rightarrow -\infty}(g(x) = (x + 2)(x - 1)(x - 2)) \implies g(x) \rightarrow -\infty[/tex]
Thus, function's graph rises from bottom left to top right on its ends (which are not finite points, but arbitrarily ahead or behind).
- Finding zeros:
Putting y = g(x) = 0, we get:
g(x) = (x + 2)(x − 1)(x − 2) = 0
This output must've become zero because of some or all factors evaluating:
(x+2) = 0, (x-1) = 0, (x-2) = 0
or
x = -2, x = 1, x = 2 (3 zeros).
- Finding y-intercepts:
Putting x = 0, we get:
g(x) = (x + 2)(x − 1)(x − 2)
g(0) = 2(-1)(-2) = 4
Thus, y-intercept of the considered function is at y = 4
Part B: Consider a = 1, b = 2 in f(x) = (x − a)(x − b)
Then, we get: f(x) = (x-1)(x-2)
- Finding zeros:
Putting y = f(x) = 0, we get:
f(x) = (x -1)(x-2) = 0
x = 1, x = 2 (3 zeros).
- Finding y-intercepts:
Putting x = 0, we get:
f(x) = (x − 1)(x − 2)
f(0) = (-1)(-2) = 2
Thus, y-intercept of the considered function is at y = 2
Their graphs are attached below.
Thus, the solutions to the sub parts are:
- No, Ray and Kelsey cannot be correct together, as three degree polynomial can have at max three intercepts.
- Part A: The considered function is g(x) = (x + 2)(x − 1)(x − 2) . It rises from bottom left to top right on its ends. Its zeros are x = -2, x = 1, and x = 2. It's y-intercept is at y = 4
- Part B: The y-intercept of the parabola is on . Its zeros are x = 1, x = 2. It's y-intercept is at y = 2
Learn more about zeros of a polynomial function here:
https://brainly.com/question/19508384

