Given the incomplete proof below, what is the missing reason for the statement in step 4?
![Given the incomplete proof below what is the missing reason for the statement in step 4 class=](https://us-static.z-dn.net/files/d52/9dd56e469a7a1225e01d0a4712421c04.png)
Answer:
ASA Congruence Theorem
Step-by-step explanation:
Already,it has been stated and proved that two angles (<ABC and <CAB) and an included side (AB) in ∆ABC are congruent to corresponding two angles (<ABD and <DAB) and an included side (AB) in ∆ABD.
Therefore, based on the ASA Congruence Theorem, ∆ABC is congruent to ∆ABD.
The missing reason is "ASA Congruence Theorem"