Answer:
D
Explanation:
"The type of fallacy does Abbey's argument contain is Ad hominem fallacy; it should be because ad hominem fallacies are recognized for attacking a person's character.
From Abbey's argument, one can know about the Ad hominem fallacy that is available or can be seen in it. Hence, Option D is correct
Reasoning that has been derived and that is also without any kind of evidence to support it. There are basically two types of fallacies. One is formal and the second is informal. In the formal fallacy, an argument that has both premise and conclusion, and it at the same time doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
On the other hand, in the informal fallacy, there is an element missing which is in the form, content, or context of the argument. Ad hominem is another informal logical fallacy. It is derived from the Latin that means “to the man”. It means an argument that is rebutted by attacking the person.
Thus, Option D is correct.
Learn more about fallacy from here:
https://brainly.com/question/14669739
#SPJ5
