Question

Question 1: Explain why a historian might not think that this passage provides enough evidence
to understand the role of railroad workers during this strike in Columbus?

Answer 1

As you did not provide the passage in question, I will give general reasons why a historian might not think a source provides enough evidence for an event or why the source may be unreliable.

A historian will generally not think a source presents enough evidence if:

• the creator of the source was not there when the event happened.
• the creator of the source is not a reliable authority on the events described by virtue of being professional educated in it.
• the source is not fact-checked by professionals
• the source presented an opinion instead of fact

In conclusion, if the passage in question had any of these qualities, a historian might not think it provides enough evidence to enable one to understand the event in question.

Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/6615003.