1) The fourth statement is not a good definition. Because it is not sufficient that the ray splits the angle into two angles, it is necessary that the two angles are equal.
2) Detachment law: given that both m and m -> n are true, then you may conclude that n is also true.
In this case the first premise is:
If I can afford to buy a ticket, then I can go to the concert.
To draw a conclusion by the Law of Detachment you need to know that "I can afford to buy a ticket" but the second premise does not say that, then you cannot draw a conclusion.
The answer to this part is D. Not possible.