Question

(a) Briefly describe ONE major difference between Remini's and
Wallace's historical interpretations of Jackson's Indian removal
policies.

Answer 1

Answer:He said the major cause of friction are the immigrants who come into the South and external forces too.

Explanation:

Wallace contested several times to be the Governor of Alabama but lost. He was known as a segregationist and the Blacks didn’t like him. He then started changing his ideology about racism and then eventually won.

He said the major cause of friction are the immigrants who come into the South and external forces too. He said the whites and blacks lived peacefully in the past before racism started.

Answer 2

Remini saw Jackson's policies as a way to protect indigenous people, while Wallace saw policies as a way to usurp and oppress indigenous people.

We can arrive at this answer because:

• Robert Remini and Anthony Wallace were two historians who analyzed Andrew Jackson's stance on the Indian Removal Act of 1830 in very different ways.
• Remini saw this act as beneficial and an attempt by Jackson to protect the indigenous people from the settlers' ambition.
• Wallace, on the other hand, saw this act as a violent policy of oppression of the native people and usurpation of indigenous territory, as a way to promote expansionism and exalt the "white man."

With that, we can see that the study of history can show different inferences of the same event, for this reason, the debate of these events is so important.

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/9367389?referrer=searchResults