How did the Han's imperial Mandate of Heaven differ from Roman emperors' claims that they were the sons of gods? Choose 1 answer: Choose 1 answer: (Choice A) A Roman emperors used their divine title to justify their rule while the Mandate of Heaven only gave religious leadership to the emperor. (Choice B) B Even though both were used to legitimize their rule, only Chinese emperors could rely solely on the Mandate to keep them in power. (Choice C) C The Mandate of Heaven justified the emperor's dynastic rule while Roman emperors' claims to a divine connection simply placed them at the head of Roman religion. (Choice D, Checked) D While both justified their respective rules, the Mandate of Heaven was seen as conditional while the Roman's claims were not.

C The Mandate of Heaven justified the emperor's dynastic rule while Roman emperors' claims to a divine connection simply placed them at the head of Roman religion.

Explanation:

The Mandate of Heaven was the main factor that gave Chinese emperor legitimacy to their rule, while for Roman Emperors, divine connection was simply the aspect that put them as heads of the Roman Religion, but their legitimacy as rulers came from their family relations: being the son or close-family of the former emperor.