Question

Which statement best explains whether △ABC is congruent to △DEF?


​△ABC is congruent to △DEF because △ABC can be mapped to △DEF by a reflection across the y-axis followed by a translation 5 units down.

​△ABC​ is congruent to △DEF because △ABC can be mapped to △DEF by a rotation of 90° counterclockwise about the origin followed by a reflection across the y-axis.

​△ABC​ is congruent to △DEF because △ABC can be mapped to △DEF by a translation 5 units down followed by a reflection across the x-axis.

△ABC is not congruent to △DEF because there is no sequence of rigid motions that maps △ABC to △DEF.

Answer 1

Answer: ​△ABC​ is congruent to △DEF because △ABC can be mapped to △DEF by a translation 5 units down followed by a reflection across the x-axis.

Step-by-step explanation: By moving the shape down 5 units, you are met with DEF. You then mirror it (reflect) across the y axis.

Answer 2

Answer:

I'm pretty sure it's the first one.

Step-by-step explanation: