Respuesta :
Answer:
I believe that if affirmative action was not in place then many cases would have swayed a different way. One example would be Marco DeFunis Jr. v. Odegaard. Marco was a white man who applied to the University of Washington Law School, but was denied because the school "prioritized admitting minority students who were less qualified." He sued a state education official and successfully gained admission to the school. While his case was considered "moot," there have been many cases afterward based upon race and admissions to schools which were ruled that the schools could in fact deny admission based on race. Some of the schools use this to bring in money because with a more diverse student environment there are more different people who are willing to sponsor that are in a high economic class.
Explanation:
Despite the importance of affirmative action in law, it's not used every time.
Affirmative action refers to the set of procedures that are designed in order to eliminate unlawful discrimination among applicants.
There have been different cases whereby there have been discrimination in a court ruling. There are several black people that have been killed despite the fact that they are innocent. This shows that affirmative action is not always in use.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/18004729
