Answer:
Jackson's address to Congress and the essay "Samuel's Memory" by Michael Rutledge examine a similar subject, and this is the uprooting of American Indians from their native land. However, the two passages investigate this case from very different points of view, specifically with regards to the utilization of language and diction.
In regards to Jackson’s speech, the language is very formal and businesslike, which mirrors the political nature of the content. Additionally, Jackson utilizes positive language to show that the forced removal of Native Americans is a positive activity for the United States to take, as it will open up more land to whites. In contrast, the passage "Samuel's Memory" utilizes language that is less formal, which illustrates that Samuel is just a boy, and that the content is a personal story of an individual affected by this event. Also, the text reveals a substantially more raw, honest, gruesome, and negative perspective on this event.
Jackson's address to Congress and Michael Rutledge's article "Samuel's Memory" both deal with the removal of American Indians from their ancestral lands.
The two chapters approach this situation from quite different perspectives, particularly in terms of the use of language and diction.
The language used by Jackson in his speech is quite professional and businesslike, which reflects the political character of the material. Furthermore, Jackson used positive language to demonstrate that the forcible removal of Native Americans is a beneficial activity for the United States, since it would allow whites to access more territory.
The paragraph "Samuel's Memory," on the other hand, uses less formal language to show that Samuel is still a little child.
Find out more information about 'Native Americans'.
https://brainly.com/question/8678061?referrer=searchResults
