What was the Supreme Court's main decision in Palko v. Connecticut? Palka was the victim of unconstitutional double jeopardy. Palka's sentence should be reversed. Palka could not be convicted because of his Fifth Amendment rights. Palka's conviction and execution should be upheld.

Respuesta :

Answer:

Palka's conviction and execution should be upheld.

Explanation:

Palko was charged for first degree murder but was only convicted for second degree murder, he got the life imprisonment. A second trial after an appeal by the state of connecticut found him guilty of first degree murder. He was to be given the death penalty. Palko believed his rights were being violated. But the judge upheld this ruling and on the 12th of April 1938, he was executed on an electric chair in connecticut.

The Supreme Court's main decision in Palko v. Connecticut is that Palka's conviction and execution should be upheld.

What is the significance of the Palko v Connecticut case?

The Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319 case was a case that took place in the year 1937.

In this case, the Supreme Court was said to have  ruled against applying to the inform the federal double jeopardy provisions of the Fifth Amendment. In this case also, The Supreme Court's ruled that the Palka's conviction and execution should be upheld.

Learn more about  Supreme Court  from

https://brainly.com/question/18228641

ACCESS MORE