Question

Though the outcomes of Tinker and Schenck differed, which best describes what these court decisions have in common?

They agreed that political expression could be restricted.
They agreed that libel was not protected speech.
They agreed that symbolic speech could be protected.
They agreed that speech rights could be limited to protect safety.

Answer 1

Answer: D

They agreed that speech rights could be limited to protect safety.

Explanation:

Answer 2

They agreeing that speech rights could be limited to protect safety was the similarity between the outcomes of Tinker and Schenck court decisions.

What is Safety?

This involves being safe from things which may cause loss, damage or hurt to an individual.

Speech rights being limited in the two court decisions were pronounced as it will help to protect safety thereby making option D the most appropriate choice.

Read more about Safety here https://brainly.com/question/14367881