Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the mangers claim.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given;
Sample Size; n = 1600
Sample proportion; p^ = 0.26
Population Proportion; p = 0.24
The hypotheses are;
Null Hypothesis: H0: p = 0.24
Alternative Hypothesis: Ha: p ≠ 0.24
The z-formula for this is;
z = (p^ - p)/√(p(1 - p)/n)
Plugging in the relevant values, we have;
z = (0.26 - 0.24)/√(0.24(1 - 0.24)/1600)
z = 0.02/0.01067707825
z = 1.87
From online p-value from z-score calculator, with 2 tail attached, we have;
p = 0.061484
This p-value is less than the significance level of 0.1. Thus, we will reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough evidence to support the managers claim.