Question

Which claim is the most effective for the argument that the minimum age to get a driver’s license should be changed to 18? Some 16-year-olds help out by driving their younger siblings to school, so changing the minimum driving age to 18 would be a problem for them. Some 16-year-olds are mature enough to drive, but changing the minimum driving age to 18 would be an overall benefit for everyone. Changing the minimum driving age to 18 would mean safer roads for everyone, since less-experienced drivers are more likely to have accidents. Changing the minimum driving age to 18 shouldn’t cause too much of a problem, because it’s only two years older than 16.

Answer 1

Answer:

C.) Changing the minimum driving age to 18 would mean safer roads for everyone, since less-experienced drivers are are more likely to have accidents.

Explanation:

-correct on Edg-

Hope this helps ^^

Answer 2

The most significant point about the alteration of driver's license age eligibility would be the option (c) or (iii).

What is the most effective argument?

Lowering the driving age will increase the number of accidents and fatalities on our roads, which would be detrimental to society.

Because of their inexperience and lack of skill, younger drivers are more likely to be involved in an accident than older drivers.

Therefore, Inexperienced drivers are more likely to cause accidents, raising the minimum driving age to 18 would make the roads safer for everyone.

For more information about Driver's License, refer below

https://brainly.com/question/4363392