Answer:
C. The allotment of federal and state powers.
Explanation:
Strict constructionists are those who follow or support the legal philosophy of limiting or restricting interpretations of judicial matters. They believe in the literal interpretation of the laws and constitution, just as it is written or stated.
Loose constructionists, on the other hand, are the opposite of the strict constructionists. As is obvious, they believe in the ability and possibility of interpreting the judicial constructs of the constitution, allowing for a broad interpretation and no specific restrictions.
One of the main points on which these two groups of constructionists disagree the most on is the allotment of powers between the federal and state governments. The issue of this allotment isn't clearly stated in the Constitution, which led to a wide range of interpretation from both sides, according to their own beliefs. While the former group believes in the states to maintain the bulk of the power, the loose constructionist group believe in the federal side maintaining the bulk of power.
