What is Rohrbach's MAIN argument against Proposition B? A. Most Missourians are too poor to pay for the tax increase. B. Proposition B doesn't raise enough money to repair the roads. C. The money raised by Proposition B will unlikely go to improving the roads. D. The roads are in good condition and don't need to be repaired.

Rohrbach's main argument against Proposition B is that the money raised by Proposition B will unlikely go to improving the roads. Therefore, C is the correct option.

What was proposition B?

Proposition B was a tax system introduced in Missouri under there were provisions to increase the amount of taxes that were imposed by the government. One of the purposes of increasing the amount of taxation was to improve the roads in Missouri.

All the people in town were asked to pay the increased amount of taxes which included both the people who knew how to drive and those who dint know about driving. Also, half of the people didn't know how to drive. Rohrbach argued that there was already a huge amount of money being paid to the government in form of various taxes. He doubted the requirement of this increased amount in taxes to repair the roads. And therefore doubted the intentions of the government to repair roads.

Rohrbach's main argument against Proposition B is that the money raised by Proposition B will unlikely go to improving the roads. Therefore, C is the correct option.

To know more about taxes, visit the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/16423331

#SPJ5