Question

When would a secondary source be considered unreliable?
O A. When it omits information that contradicts its conclusions
O B. When it is written by an academic professional
O C. When it is written by someone who did not experience an event
directly
O D. When it offers a theory about the significance of an event

Answer 1

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Ommiting information is a sign of unreliability as it manipulates what readers see and can create false conclusions.