contestada

Which statement best describes Wiesel's use of a rhetorical device?
O A. Wiesel asks rhetorical questions with the expectation that his
audience, the president of the United States, will answer them.
O B. Wiesel uses several metaphors and similes in order to help his
audience better understand the suffering he endured.
O C. Wiesel presents himself as an expert on his topic in order to help
the audience find him more trustworthy.
D. Wiesel ends his speech with several rhetorical questions to leave
the audience with something to think about.

Respuesta :

Answer: D. Wiesel ends his speech with several rhetorical questions to leave  the audience with something to think about.

Explanation:

Wiesel's use of a rhetorical device because of option D: Wiesel ends his speech with several rhetorical questions to leave the audience with something to think about.

Who is Wiesel?

Eliezer "Elie" Wiesel was a Romanian-American Holocaust survivor. He was also a famous novelist, political activist and professor.

Wiesel was also a prisoner in the Auschwitz and Buchenwald concentration camps, and he tells about his story in the Night to all.

Moreover, Wiesel fight for innocent victims in different places like South Africa, Nicaragua, Kosovo, Armenia and Sudan.

According to given excerpt, He was the only observer of Nazi camps. He tries to remove all the injustice and therefore, his personality is represented as the volunteer for these situation.

He argue the readers of the story to find the way to reduce this injustice and also ask whether the change will ever happen or not. He also makes statement to the reader whether these injustices will ever stop and if they are any different from those during WWII.

Therefore, correct option is D.

Learn more about Wiesel, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/13955831

#SPJ2

Here is the full paragraph:

Read this excerpt from the conclusion of Elie Wiesel's "The Perils of Indifference" speech:

Does it mean that we have learned from the past? Does it mean that society has changed? Has the human being become less indifferent and more human? Have we really learned from our experiences? Are we less insensitive to the plight of victims of ethnic cleansing and other forms of injustices in places near and far? Is today's justified intervention in Kosovo, led by you, Mr. President, a lasting warning that never again will the deportation, the terrorization of children and their parents, be allowed anywhere in the world? Will it discourage other dictators in other lands to do the same?