Answer:
Explanation:
a.
The experiment under study from the article involves a single factor fertilizer type, at three levels.
Hence, this is a completely randomized design with p=3 treatments.
Assuming :
[tex]\mu_ 1 ; \mu_2 \ and \ \mu_3[/tex] are mean heights for three types of fertilizer. Therefore, the null and alternative hypotheses are:
Null hypothesis:
[tex]H_o : \mu_ 1 = \mu_2 \ = \ \mu_3[/tex] ( i.e all type of population mean heights for three different fertilizers f are equal )
Alternative hypothesis:
[tex]H_1 :\mu_ 1 \neq \mu_2 \ \neq \ \mu_3[/tex] ( at least one of the fertilizer is not equal )
b.
This is a completely randomized design as p=3 treatment means are compared, where treatments are randomly assigned to the experimental units.
c.
[tex]SSTr(df)=p-1 \\ \\ =3-1 \\ \\=2, \\ \\ df(SSE)=n-p \\ \\ =30-3 \\ \\ =27 \\ \\ MSTr=SSTr/df(SSTr) \\ \\=192.374/2 \\ \\ =96.187; MSE=SSE/df(SSE) \\ \\ =439.389/27 \\ \\ =16.2737 \\ \\ F=MSTr/MSE \\ \\ =96.187/16.2737 \\ \\ =5.91[/tex]
d.
[tex]SST=SSTr+SSE \\ \\ =192.374+439.389\\ \\ =631.763[/tex]
e.
Given that the p-value is 0.007 and F = 5.91
Also;
p-value 0.007 is less than the level of significance 0.05.
Thus ; we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is difference in mean of all types of the fertilizers.