Respuesta :
1. The refund should prevail because of the reasonable customary and prudent course of the action caused by the practitioners in the same or similar circumstances would be the same.
The statement that best describes the applicable standard of care, in this case, is 1. The defense should prevail because the reasonable, customary, and prudent course of action followed by practitioners in the same or similar circumstances would be the same.
What is the applicable standard of care?
The applicable standard of care is taking any actions reasonably likely to have the opposite effect than a reasonable and prudent person acting in similar circumstances.
The case is of a patient who is diagnosed with glaucoma in after. And when she took the test the glaucoma test was not written for the patient, and now she sued the ophthalmologist.
The defense should reclaim the claim because it is not the doctors' act that she got glaucoma. It is not a mistake of the ophthalmologist.
Thus, the correct option is 1. The defense ought to be successful because doing nothing would not be the reasonable, typical, or sensible course of action used by practitioners in the same or comparable situations.
To learn more about the applicable standard of care, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/28155015
#SPJ2