Respuesta :
Answer:
He should have found 8 as the exponent, not –8.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the expression simplified by Pablo as [tex](2^{-4})^{-2}[/tex]
On simplification we have;
According to one of the law of indices [tex](a^{m})^{n} = a^{mn}[/tex]
Applying this law to the question will give;
[tex](2^{-4})^{-2}\\=2^{-4*-2} \\\= 2^{8}[/tex]
Based on the calculation above, the exponent of 2 is 8 which means that Pablo should have found 8 as the exponent, not –8.
Answer:
C. He should have found 8 as the exponent, not –8.
Step-by-step explanation: