Which of the following would constitute a breach of constitutional law by a police officer?

proceeding with court-ordered wiretapping
conducting interviews that lead to a confession
admitting evidence subject to inevitable discovery
conducting searches and seizures without a court order or valid arrest

Respuesta :

Answer: D. conducting searches and seizures without a court order or valid arrest

Explanation: In order to search or seize a place or person, law enforcement officers must have a search warrent issued by a judge. Any evidence found in an illegal search cannot be used in a court of law.

The act of conducting searches without the court order or valid arrest is termed as the breaching of constitutional law by police officer. Thus, option D is correct.

What is constitutional law?

The constitutional law is given as the orders formed in the constitution, and are to be followed by every individual in the nation. The disobeying of the constitutional law has been considered as an offence.

The police officers according to the constitution are considered to search or seize only with the court orders, failing to do so is considered as the breaching of law.  Thus, option D is correct.

Learn more about constitutional law, here:

https://brainly.com/question/1432210

#SPJ5

ACCESS MORE
EDU ACCESS
Universidad de Mexico