Question

How did the Supreme Court rulings regarding segregation differ in the time

between Plessy v. Ferguson and Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg?


A. Both cases were left undecided by the Supreme Court.


B. Both cases were against the separate-but-equal doctrine.


C. Support for the separate-but-equal doctrine increased.


D. Support for the separate-but-equal doctrine diminished.


HELP ME PLS!

Answer 1

Answer:

C

I've never heard of Swann case but from process of elimantion I know plessy v Ferguson helped the increase in sparate bu equal so that makes since.

Answer 2

The Supreme Court rulings regarding segregation differ in the time between Plessy v. Ferguson and Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg both cases were against the separate-but-equal doctrine.

• After the Civil War, the Southern found a way to keep the African Americans separate by introducing segregation laws.
• These laws separated African Americans from white by building different schools, public places, parks, etc.
• When the Brown v. Board of Education decision declared the same school to everyone, most southerners had no plan of desegregating their schools.
• The Brown v. Board of Education decision denied the concept of separate but equal.

Therefore we can conclude that Plessy v. Ferguson and Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg stood against the separate-but-equal doctrine.

Thus option B. is the correct answer.

Learn more about "Plessy v. Ferguson" here:

brainly.com/question/1284679