Question

As scientists began investigating living things and their cellular structure they developed a set of principles that are now known as the cell theory
The statements below summarize cell theory
• All living things are made up of cells.
Cells are the basic units of structure and function in living things
• New cells are produced from existing cells.
Daniel proposes that if scientists continue to gather evidence in support of the cell theory, they eventually should reclassify the theory as a law of
cells. Which statement is the most useful evaluation of Daniel's proposal?

A The proposal is reasonable, because theories often are reclassified as laws when the evidence is overwhelming

B. The proposal is reasonable, although only rarely is enough evidence gathered to reclassify theories as laws

C.The proposal is not reasonable because scientists have discovered too many exceptions to the cell theory to state it as a law.

D. The proposal is not reasonable, because a theory is never reclassified as a law, nor is a law reclassified as a theory,

Answer 1

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

Answer 2

The proposal is not reasonable, because a theory is never reclassified as a law, nor is a law reclassified as a theory (Option D).

What are scientific theories?

Scientific theories are scientifically sound explanations that were progressively tested and verified.

• Scientific theories can be used to predict certain outcomes related to such explanations.

In conclusion, the proposal is not reasonable, because a theory is never reclassified as a law, nor is a law reclassified as a theory (Option D).

Learn more about scientific theories here:

https://brainly.com/question/11555274

#SPJ2