Respuesta :
Answer:
1. I tended to favor a loose interpretation for this case. Although students have the right to express their opinions, it is necessary for restrictions in order to avoid mayhem within the student body. I believe that the school was properly protecting its students’ rights and representing the interest of the majority. Yes, newspapers are a form of public expressions but it is a school environment and the faculty has every right to alter the paper as needed.
2. Summary of the Decision. The Supreme Court ruled against the students in a 5-3 decision. Justice White wrote the majority opinion, concluding that the First Amendment does not prevent school officials from exercising reasonable authority over the content of school-sponsored publications.
3. The factor that most influenced your decision and interpretations in this case was the First Amendment. I believe the First Amendment to be very important because a minor should have the right to assembly in public places without being cited because they were out past curfew.
Explanation:
The question on whether my personal opinion reflected the minority or majority opinion in the case between Hazelwood versus Kuhlmeier T.M v. State of Florida is:
- I believe that while the students have their rights to freedom of speech and expression, it cannot be used as a disruptive tool in a school environment.
My personal opinion about the interpretation of the laws and rights of each case is that:
- I think the Supreme Court made the right decision to rule against the students in a 5-3 decision.
The factor which most influenced my decision and interpretation in each case are:
- The First Amendment
Read more about freedom of speech here:
https://brainly.com/question/13502936
Otras preguntas
