Question

Others say it would be too expensive and would reduce the quality of care. Examine editorials from both sides of the argument. Then, write a five-paragraph essay in which you compare and contrast each argument in terms of objectivity and the types of evidence presented. Evaluate and explain how the sources use effective evidence to support their claims.

Answer 1

Answer:

Explanation below

Explanation:

It should be understood that if it's is expensive, it doesn't not mean that it will reduce the quality of the care, but it only means that, it will prevent people from being able to afford it.

This will actually result to people from being able to have access to good and quality care, that they suppose to have.

In order words, when it is not expensive, people will actually have access but the quality of the care will drop and not be good as expected.

Answer 2

Explanation:

All answers are incorrect. The assignment is to COMAPRE AND CONTRAST THE OPINIONS OF 2 EDITORIALS that have already stated their stand on this matter. It is not to state what our viewpoint is. Has anyone actually found the correct essay written for this?

:-(