Answer:
A. Considers certain individual rights or duties as universal, regardless of the outcome
Explanation:
Morals are simply decision to do right or wrong.
The concept of Moral Idealism is such that particular rights of individuals are universal, not minding the consequences.
Moral Idealism is markedly different from utilitarianism which is the focus on the "greatest good for the greatest number".
Moral Idealism posits that individual rights must be protected at all costs, while utilitarianism does not necessarily believe that individual rights must be protected as long as it is for the greater good.
Moral Idealism is what it is, an ideal, which may not be feasible in practise but makes perfect sense in theory.
Answer:
b. Is the focus of the "greatest good for the greatest number."
Explanation:
In Idealism, it shows the view of an individual irrespective of the challenges or issues that might crop up. In the same view, moral idealism is the moral standard set and held by someone irrespective of the outcome of such view. An example, someone that decided to always tell the truth irrespective of whether his life is in danger or not is said to exhibit a moral idealism.
It focus has been the greatest good for the greatest number of people and are most carried out by people with idealistic view such as Mary of Calcutta of India or Maha Gandi.
