Respuesta :
Answer:
Explanation:
Rooney is not personally and criminally responsible for the failure of the organization to make compulsory trust deposits, also the evidence is not enough to ascertain any conviction for embezzlement, therefore the convictions should be reversed and the indictments should be dismissed.
Answer:
Rooney should not be personally convicted for the outcome
Explanation:
Aware of the fact that Rooney did not reach such decision on a personal level but a collective decision, and if the policy was not evoked as at the time of the company's startup, then the companies is riot criminally liable.
Again, ignorance of the law is not an excuse. The claim of Rooney as an individual can be valid for him as a person but not as a policy that guides the management and operation of all companies.