Respuesta :
Answer:
a) There is no evidence to support the claim that there is no difference in mean foam expansion of these two agents.
b) P=0
c) 90% CI
[tex]-3.2406\leq \mu_1-\mu_2 \leq -2.2614[/tex]
This CI tells us that there is a 90% confidence that the real value of the difference between the means is between this two values. We see that both are negative values, so the value 0 is left out of the interval.
That means we can be almost sure both means don't have the same value, confirming the results of the previous test.
Step-by-step explanation:
The null and alternative hypothesis are:
[tex]H_0: \mu_1-\mu_2=0\\\\H_a: \mu_1-\mu_2\neq 0[/tex]
The significance level is 0.10 and it will be a two-tailed test.
The difference of the sample means is:
[tex]M_d=M_1-M_2=4.340-7.091=-2.751[/tex]
As the sample size is equal for both samples, the estimated standard error of the difference between means is calculated as:
[tex]s_M_d=\sqrt{\frac{s_1^2+s_2^2}{N}}= \sqrt{\frac{0.508^2+0.430^2}{5}}=\sqrt{\frac{0.442964}{5} }= \sqrt{0.0886}=0.2976[/tex]
Then, the statistic z is:
[tex]z=\frac{M_d-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_M_d}=\frac{-2.751-0}{0.2976}=-9.24\\\\P(|z|>9.24)=0[/tex]
The P-value (P=0) is much lower than the significance level, so the null hypothesis is rejected. The means are different.
For a 90% confidence interval for the difference of the means, we use a z=1.645.
Then the confidence interval is defined as:
[tex]M_d-z*s_M_d\leq \mu_1-\mu_2 \leq M_d-z*s_M_d\\\\-2.751-1.645*0.2976\leq \mu_1-\mu_2 \leq -2.751+1.645*0.2976\\\\-3.2406\leq \mu_1-\mu_2 \leq -2.2614[/tex]
This CI tells us that there is a 90% confidence that the real value of the difference between the means is between this two values. We see that both are negative values, so the value 0 is left out of the interval.
That means we can be almost sure both means don't have the same value.