Respuesta :
The agency's position is that Bob had already signed a contract, and that the contract included a placement fee due to the fact that Bob was able to find this job through the agency. On the other hand, the position that Bob would most likely argue is that he is a minor. As a minor, Bob is allowed to disaffirm his contract. Therefore, Bob is likely to win in this dispute.
Bob can disaffirm the contract with the employment agency as he was the minor, and according to the law, each contract made with or by a minor is void-ab-initio.
What is the position of minor's contract?
According to the Indian contract act, it is clearly defined that the every contract made with a minor or by a minor is void from the very beginning.
If any contract made by or with a minor, it cannot be enforceable by law if the another party file a suit against a minor.
In the above case, since Bob is the minor, hence the contract made by Bob with the with Pioneer Temporary Staffing Agency, LLC, an employment agency to find a job is void.
There is no matter whether the bob used the service of the agency, or not, it cannot be enforceable by law, by the agency against the minor.
This means that if Bob not wants to return the fees amount if $200 to the agency, then the agency cannot enforce against the bob.
Hence, the case is in favor of the bob if he disaffirm to pay the fees.
Learn more about the minor, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/10678875