Question

Carlos, a student of psychology, included the data and findings of the renowned thinker, Erik Erikson, in his research. But he failed to paraphrase the data or cite and credit the actual author. The board of reviewers rejected Carlos's research paper on account of _____.

a. Perjury
b. Extortion
c. Plagiarism
d. Manslaughter

Answer 1

Answer:

c. Plagiarism

Explanation:

In research, the term plagiarism refers to taking some other person's work (or ideas) and writing them as if they were one's own ideas. In other words, it's taking the ideas of someone else and making them look as if they were one's own.

In this example, Carlos included the data and findings of Erikson but he neither paraphrased the data or cite and credit the author. Therefore, it seemed in his words as if it was actually his words instead of Erik Erikson ones. Therefore, the board of reviewers can consider this as an act of plagiarism.

Answer 2

Psychology student included the data and findings of the renowned thinker, Erik Erikson, in his research. But he failed to paraphrase the data  and credit the actual author. The board of reviewers rejected Carlos's research paper on account of plagiarism.

What is Plagiarism:

• Plagiarism means showing somebody else's work or ideas as your own, with or without their consent,

• By compounding it into your work without full acceptance.

• The best mode of forbidding plagiarism is to learn and use the principles of solid domain practice from the occurrence of individual's body occupation.

In this instance, Carlos covered the data and collections of Erikson but he neither paraphrased the collections and approval of the writer. Therefore, it looked in his words as if it was actually his words alternatively of Erik Erikson ones.

Therefore, the board of reviewers can consider this as an act of plagiarism.

Hence, the correct option is [C]

Learn more about  Plagiarism , refer:

https://brainly.com/question/1498360