Question

Reread this sentence from paragraph 4 "no one can argue against increased efficiency, and the use of rbst makes dairy farms more efficient." which is the best evaluation of the reasoning in this sentence 1. the reasoning is faulty because the statement is an example of a wrong-cause fallacy. 2. the reasoning supports a logical argument because it provides an expert opinion. 3.the reasoning is faulty because it makes the over generalization that no one can argue against increased efficacy. 4.the reasoning supports a logical argument because efficiency is a concept that can be supported with facts and statistics.

Answer 1

The reasoning supports a logical argument because efficiency is a concept that can be supported with facts and statistics.

Answer: Option 4.

Explanation:

The administration of rbst helps to increase the production of milk with increasing the efficiency of the cows used to produce milk in the dairy farming.

In lactating dairy cows, bST is a major regulator of milk production. It does this by coordinating metabolism to allow more nutrients for milk production. The net effect is that rbst- supplemented cows produce more milk and utilize nutrients more efficiently. And it has been experimented and found that it is not harmful for human consumption also.

Answer 2

Answer:

the reasoning is faulty because it makes the overgeneralization that no one can argue against increased efficiency.

Explanation:

i just did it on i-ready