Question

Under our Constitution, free speech is not a right that is given only to be so circumscribed that it exists in principle, but not in fact. Freedom of expression would not truly exist if the right could be exercised only in an area that a benevolent government has provided as a safe haven for crackpots.

Which is the best summary of the passage? (apex)

Answer 1

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

It is stating that free speech would not truly exist if the right to use it could only be exercised in a specific area.

Answer 2

Answer:

A. In his majority opinion on Tinker vs. Des Moines, Justice Fortas argues that free speech would not truly exist if people could only express thir opinions in designted places.

Explanation:

A is the only answer that summarizes the passage correctly. You could automatically eliinate answer B because it says I agree and that is not what the question is asking. You could also eliminate asnwer C beause thats not the point he is making. And then answer D is a summary but is really just restating the orignial passage therefore A is the correct answer. I also got it right when I just tookt the test.