Scientists calculated the net primary productivity at two different forest sites. Both forests have the same gross primary productivity. Forest A has a net primary productivity of 1,650kcal/m^2/year, and forest B has a net primary productivity of 1,110kcal/m^2/year. Which of the following statements is best supported by the data?a. Forest A has a higher rate of decomposition by bacteria than forest B.b. Forest A has more biodiversity than forest B.c. Forest A producers have lower rates of cellular respiration than forest B producers.d. Forest A producers have more biomass than forest B producers.

Cellular respiration may be defined as a set of metabolic processes and reactions. It is a process that takes place inside the cells of the organisms and it convert biochemical energy from the nutrients into ATP or adenosine triphosphate, thus releasing waste products.

It is given that the gross primary productivity of both the forest A and forest B is same. And the net primary productivity of forest B is lower than the net productivity of forest A, so the forest B has a high rate of cellular respiration.

Therefore the cellular respiration of forest A is lower than forest B.

Thus the correct option is (c).

topeadeniran2 topeadeniran2 · Answer 2 · 2021-09-04T11:26:20+02:00

The statements that is best supported by the data is that "Forest A producers have lower rates of cellular respiration than forest B producers".

Cellular respiration is when organisms combine oxygen with the molecules that's gotten from foodstuffs which then diverts the chemical energy into activities which are life sustaining and then waste products will be released.

Since both forests have the same gross primary productivity while the bet primary productivity for forest B is lower than that of forest A, then it can be deduced that forest B will have a rate of cellular respiration that's higher.

In conclusion, the best option is C.

Read related link on:

https://brainly.com/question/15403149