Well, the 89c bulb lasts twice as much, but costs less than twice as much. So, it's a better option. Here are two other ways to figure this out:
1) After 2000 hours, you will have used two 60c bulbs (each of them lasted 1000 hours). So, you will have spend 1.2 dollars. On the other hand, in the same 2000 hours, you would have needed only one 89c buls (which would have lasted the whole 2000 hours).
2) You can compute the dollars-per-hour ratio: spending 60c for 1000 hours means that you pay
[tex]\dfrac{0.6}{1000}=0.0006[/tex]
dollars per hour. Similarly, the other bulb costs
[tex]\dfrac{0.89}{2000}=0.000445[/tex]
dollars per hour, which is less.