Respuesta :
Answer:
Jerremy has arrived at an (incorrect) fallacious conclusion.
Explanation:
Jeremy in assuming that there is a direct correlation between the two factors: being vegetarian and going to the moon. However that is nos not true, those events have no proven direct correlation on their own, so, becoming a vegetarian will not increase the probability of him going to the moon. Even if a correlation could be proven it would be possible to assume that being an astronaut increases the chances of one being vegetarian, not the other way around.
Answer:
Jeremy has arrived at an (incorrect) cause and effect conclusion.
Explanation:
"Claims of cause and effect are propositions based on the concept that one thing influences or causes another."
Jeremy is arguing that being a vegetarian is the cause to be an astronaut.
Reference: Writing@CSU, “Claims of Cause and Effect” Welcome to Writing@CSU, 2019