Which descriptions accurately explain two types of constitutional interpretation?
Choose exactly two answers that are correct.
Favoring a "loose" interpretation of the Constitution means believing that Congress
should be permitted to enact any law that is necessary and that the Constitution does
not directly forbid.
Favoring a "strict" interpretation of the Constitution means believing that Congress
should only enact those types of laws that the Constitution directly states they have the
power to enact.
Favoring a "fair" interpretation of the Constitution means believing that Congress can
and should only enact laws that reflect modern ideas about equality and justice.
Favoring a "bold" interpretation of the Constitution means believing that Congress can
and should enact laws regardless of what the Constitution says or does not say about
their power to do so.

Considering the available options, the statements that accurately describe two types of constitutional interpretation are options A and B.

This is because option A is correct as Favoring a "loose" interpretation of the Constitution means believing that Congress should be permitted to enact any necessary law and that the Constitution does not directly forbid.

This is evident because the United States Constitution does not have all the laws embedded in it.

Hence, there are acts, laws, and amendments made by Congress to make up for different situations.

Also, option B is correct as Favoring a "strict" interpretation of the Constitution means believing that Congress should only enact those types of laws that the Constitution directly states they have the power to enact.

This is because there are cases where the Constitution has clearly defined what needs to be done in a situation where specific circumstances occurred.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the statements that accurately describe two types of constitutional interpretation are strict and loose.

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/18891350