Respuesta :
Answer:
(B) It denied Congress the power to abolish slavery in the territories.
Explanation:
Dred Scott v. Sanford is a case where an African American slave named Dred Scott argued that since he was a Missouri slave who traveled to a free state, on his return, he should be a free man.
The Chief Justice at the time disagreed, based on the current constitution of the United States, and in response declared that a slave is not entitled to its freedom, whether it lives in free or slavery states. By stating that abolishing slavery is unconstitutional, the U.S Congress deems that there is no 'free state' to the outrage of the population. This was the status quo until the constitution was amended to include the abolishment of slavery.
Answer:
(B) One proposal included clear boundaries for where slavery could and couldn't exist.
(D) One proposal included a clause to compensate slave owners if fugitives could not be returned.
Explanation:
The Crittenden Compromise was a proposal to make slavery part of the constitution, making it impossible to be amended nor changed. In this proposal, slavery states and free states have clear boundaries, and Congress is not allowed to abolish slavery in slavery states. Other components include the provision of allowing compensation for slave owners with runaway slaves which have managed to flee to free states.
There was no mention of tariffs reduction, although it does allow barriers to the African slave trade to be removed so the slave owners can acquires slaves more easily. This proposal did not influence the Anaconda plan.
Answer:
(A) To set up a naval blockade along the southern coast
(C) To seize control of the Mississippi River
Explanation:
The Anaconda Plan is a strategy devised by the Union Army to deal with the Confederacy Army in the beginning of the Civil War. It was developed by General-in-Chief Winfield Scott.
The strategy, employs the U.S Navy since it is a tactic that focuses on dealing with the Confederacy Army through the seas (Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico) and the river (Mississippi River). The name is derived from this strategy - when drawn on a map, the blockades and defense employed around the sea and river borders create the image of a snake.
Answer:
(A) It decreased the likelihood that European countries would help the Confederacy.
(B) It gave African Americans the right to fight in the war.
Explanation:
European countries (Britain, France) entertained the possibility of helping the Confederacy during the war, although it never sent troops to support the Confederacy Army. Their desire for the Confederacy to win was underpinned by their interest in keeping slavery legal.
Britain sold ships to the confederacy, although trades between them dropped during the war. France never sent any aid, although the government at the time (Napoleon III) preferred that the Confederacy won.
The Emancipation Proclamation, which deemed that the slavery is illegal and thus every slave under any states are now free, helped in bringing more than 200,000 African-Americans into the Union Army.
1- The correct answer is B. Dred Scott v. Sanford denied Congress the power to abolish slavery in the territories.
Dred Scott vs. Sandford was a court case in the 1850s, in which a slave tried to get his freedom.
In 1857, the Supreme Court finally resolved the matter in favor of Scott's owner, fundamentally establishing that slaves were not considered as citizens of the United States, but as mere property of the slaveholders and that, therefore, they did not have the legal capacity to initiate lawsuits.
Likewise, the court ruling established that the federal Congress did not have the capacity to interfere in questions of the legality of slavery, leaving said power to each of the states.
2- The correct answers are B and D. The proposals in the Crittenden Compromise included clear boundaries for where slavery could and couldn't exist, and included a clause to compensate slave owners if fugitives could not be returned.
The Crittenden Compromise was an attempted political settlement proposed in 1860 by Senator Crittenden, with the object of reaching an agreement between the southern and northern states regarding slavery.
Fundamentally, this agreement sought to expand the sectors where slavery was legal, including, for example, California, which until then was not a slave state.
It also proposed a series of benefits for slaveowners who had lost slaves by flight to the north, in order to maintain an economic status for the slaveholders of the south.
3- The correct answers are A and C. The Anaconda Plan intended to set up a naval blockade along the southern coast, and intended to seize control of the Mississippi River.
The Anaconda Plan was proposed in 1861 by General Winfield Scott as a strategy for winning the Civil War with minimal losses, blocking the Confederate States at sea, and taking control of the Mississippi River. It consisted of two parts:
- Blockade of the coast and ports of the Southern states to prevent the export of cotton and other products, and to stop the import of war material.
- Cut off the Southwestern states from the rest of the South by controlling the Mississippi for its entire length.
4- The correct answers are A and D. The Emancipation Proclamation decreased the likelihood that European countries would help the Confederacy, and gave African Americans the right to fight in the war.
The Proclamation turned emancipation into a goal of the Civil War. It also weakened efforts within England and France to formally recognize the Confederacy. As Union troops marched through the rebels, they freed thousands of slaves a day. Many did not wait and just ran away from their owners in search of freedom.
Learn more in https://brainly.com/question/10689126
