Respuesta :
Answer:
As a licensed electrician of 10 years Hal should be aware of the risks associated with his job. Now, I'll tell you of all of the mistakes and unnecessary risks that made by Hal. First, seeing a there was no mention of a plumber, I'm going to assume that the utility room is still flooded. If it is not still flooded then ignore this and move on to my next point, but if it is then I would just like to say that as a man with 10 years of experience, he should be aware of the fact that water conducts electricity. Second, even if the electrocution didn't involve the water, as a professional he should be competent enough to wear proper safety equipment. And finally, if I was GBC I would hire another electrician to point out every mistake made and how the entire thing could have been avoided if Hal hadn't decided to cut corners.
I hope that helps! :)
The possible ways through which GBC might defend itself from the lawsuit would be:
- To state that due to Hal's ten years of experience he should be aware that water conducts electricity
- To state that a competent electrician would wear protective gear and look for short circuits in a fooded utility room.
Based on the given excerpt, we can see that the electrician Hal was very negligent in his duties to investigate the damage done to the flooded utiity room and to turn the breakers on.
The law suit filed by Hal can be easily dismissed in the law court once it has been proven that with his years of experience, he did not adequately protect himself in a high risk zone.
Read more about negligence here:
https://brainly.com/question/25911081