Respuesta :
Answer:
Explanation:
You have to infer a great deal to answer some of this. First of all, the 6 boys were out in the worst weather imaginable, without any mode of transportation. They were completely on foot. Either the 3 families were very poor or they were out when they should not have been or the storm struck suddenly. No sane parent would let them go anywhere if the storm was raging when they left. This likely was an era either when there were not autos or during the depression when no one could afford a car. I have no clue why they didn't have a horse drawn buggy or wagon. They also lived far apart somewhere in the country. The distances they had to walk suggests that. If they lived in a city, the could knock on any door to seek shelter.
The intended audience is not a group of scholars or even adults perhaps. Young teens or pre teens would be my guess. It's almost entirely action. The details are those used to convey how really hard it was to get home because they likely could not see very well. The details also suggest the struggle they had with some way to keep going straight. (Corn fields, pasture fences for guidance.)
The author is trying to convey what pre modern midwestern society winters were like. They were harsh cruel and almost unimaginably cold. We still get those winters where I live, but we are much better equipped to deal with them.
The author's point of view is that of a participant. He's not trying to persuade you of anything. He just wants to convey coldness.
Answer:
The author's point of view is that he just wants to convey coldness.
Explanation: