The Big Stick Diplomacy was implemented by Theodore Roosevelt and was a policy of intervenience in Latin American affairs because in the American view those countries could not keep their affairs in order.
The Dollar Diplomacy adopted by President Taft that promoted the American business interests abroad by replacing military alliances with economic ties, increasing American influences and securing lasting peace.
Both Diplomacies had problems but historians say that Roosevelt’s Big Stick was more successful overall because it resulted in more benefits than failures. The other two diplomacies increased hostility in Latin America and in Asia that eventually influenced the Alliances in WWI.
Taft's and Roosevelt’s diplomacy differs because Dollar Diplomacy centered on using American houses to use influence in Latin America, but the Roosevelt Corollary utilized political and military efforts.
President Taft adopted The Dollar Diplomacy, which boosted American business involvements foreign by renewing military alliances with economic ties, raising American forces, and obtaining lasting peace.
Theodore Roosevelt implemented The Big Stick Diplomacy. It was a policy of intervention in Latin American concerns because from the American perspective those countries could not maintain their concerns in order.
Both Diplomatic creates problems, but historiographers say that Roosevelt’s Big Stick was more eminent overall because it resulted in more benefits than failures.
The other two diplomatic increased enmities in Latin America and in Asia that sooner or later influenced the Group action in WWI.
Therefore, both policies are different.
To learn more about Taft and Roosevelt's policy, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/8140223
