Question

Justices practice judicial restraint when they make rulings that change the laws passed by Congress. make narrow decisions that only relate to a specific case. infer rights not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. restrict the power of the president to impose new rules.

Answer 1

Answer:

Make narrow decisions that only relate to a specific case.

Explanation:

Legal Dictionary defines judicial restraint as what happens when judges  limit the use of their power and don't try to reach beyond determining legality or constitutionality of the matter at had.  Judicial restraint also depends much on case law -- the body of previous decisions by judges on similar cases.

By contrast, Legal Dictionary defines judicial activism as "court rulings that are partially or fully based on the judge’s political or personal considerations, rather than existing laws."  Judges who practice judicial restraint will try to keep their personal views out of the decision and base their decisions on the Constitution and existing case law.

Answer 2

Justices are said to practice Judicial restraint when they make narrow decisions that only relate to a specific case.

Judicial Restraint

• This refers to making decisions that only change things in a certain case.
• This is done to maintain the general law minus the issue that the case is relevant to.

When Justices use Judicial Restraint, they do so because they do not believe that the general law should be changed so they specify their decision such that only a tiny section of the law changes.

In conclusion, option B is correct.

Find out more on Judicial restraint at https://brainly.com/question/857897.