Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
He would agree with the first one. That increases income and therefore spending. He's all for that. The answer is NOT A. In looking at A again, the only reason to pick it because it involves government intervention which was one of his key recommendations. It may be an answer, but it is sure not good economics.
I think he would disagree with B. He wouldn't like importers very much. They don't make anything that creates employment and that would be his ultimate goal.
C is the one that is really hateful. While it might help the country where the money is spent, it impoverishes the country where the citizen is living. My wife and I are victimized by this one. The United States employs this system of taxation. It is really a burden. It is only 1 of 2 countries in the world that does this. The other is Eritrea. Since Keynes was a macro economist I don't think he's approve of it much.
D importing raw materials would eventually result in employment. He would go for this. D is not the answer.
E He wouldn't like to see any industry restricted that could employ people. If the company can make 1600 vehicles and sell them, he be all for that.
The answer is between B and C. Much as I dislike C, it might be all right from his point of view. I doubt any sound economist would really go for C.
I guess A and B if you need more than 1.
