Respuesta :
Ani analyses how "DeLuca's haphazard patchwork of reasoning and evidence leaves the reader wondering whether he believes his own claim". According to Ani he quotes not only supporters of the Nobel price committee but also detractors. He includes a sampling of Dylan's lyrics and leaves them to speak for themselves.
The evidence (quotes) from the article that best supports Ani's evaluation are:
1. "And it’s a good thing [his lyrics] have been published, because if you’ve gone to see the famously sneering and syllable-garbling Dylan play live in recent years, you probably couldn’t understand a word he was singing."
We could interpret this quote as contradictory, it is not necessarily for or against Dylan's Nobel Price. You could say he is confusing his readers, he seems to be against the sung lyrics and for the published ones.
2. "On one end of Dylan's songwriting spectrum is the vengeful, resolute, and timeless 'Masters Of War' . . . . It’s high dudgeon at its finest: ‘Let me ask you one question: Is your money that good? / Will it buy you forgiveness? Do you think that it could?"
Ani also says that he does a sampling of the lyrics and allows them to speak for themselves. This excerpt shows part of a lyric from the song "Masters of War". He is not necessarily saying its a "good" or "bad" lyric, he describes it as: "vengeful, resolute, and timeless" the reader must decide about its quality or if it is the kind of work that deserves a Nobel Price.
Ani gathers the analysis about Delucas haphazard work of reasoning and showing evidence of the claim that she herself didn't believe. He not only quotes the Nobel prize supporters but also quotes the detractors of the Nobel prize and then samples the claim of Dylan's lyrics and asks for their reactions and briefings.
The evidence (quotes) from the article that best supports Ani's evaluation are:
1. "And it’s a good thing [his lyrics] have been published, because if you’ve gone to see the famously sneering and syllable-garbling Dylan play live in recent years, you probably couldn’t understand a word he was singing."
Reason: This is a contradictory statement and also he (Dylan's) is confusing his readers with the contradicts depicted. It is not necessarily for or against the Nobel prize but yes the contradiction is conflictory for this.
2. "On one end of Dylan's songwriting spectrum is the vengeful, resolute, and timeless 'Masters Of War' . . . . It’s high dudgeon at its finest: ‘Let me ask you one question: Is your money that good? / Will it buy you forgiveness? Do you think that it could?"
Reason: He says that the briefing and the comments on the claim were done om her choice and cannot be an issue for him. He is not necessarily saying that the lyric is good or bad but he is describing the lyrics as vengeful, resolute, and timeless.
The other options are also correct but the best are mentioned above that supports the case of Ani's evaluation.
To know more about evidence from the article that supports Ani's evaluation, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/12948535?referrer=searchResults