Question

Would it be better to have a love that's like a red rose or a stereo? Explain the differences and defend your choice.

Answer 1

Love that's like a red rose.
Explaination: Roses are very dynamic. Rose's themselves can mean love, furthermore a rose has thorns which can be the toxic to the relationship, or maybe bumbs in the road, which can be healthy in relationship.
This is automatically better than a stereo, having no correlation or connection to love, though I doubt anyone would want to be in s relationship with someone who is constantly loud and completely one dimensional.

Answer 2

Answer:

Hi! This is a fun question! I would've never compared love to a stereo! This is very funny :) To answer your question, I would say that it is better to have a love that's like a red rose, than a love that's more like a stereo.

Explanation:

I think that to have a love that's like a red rose is better because red roses are nice, beautiful, natural, smell good, and are the symbol of romanticism. Of course, they also have thorns, because every good thing has also its not as good side. Things are not perfect, but they definitely have more good things than bad things, and you can always have in mind that if that is not the case, it isn't love. Love is healthy, natural, precious, and beautiful, just like roses are. A stereo reminds me of something hard, loud and not very comfortable, so I wouldn't say it is the best option.