Respuesta :
a. We know form our problem that Jose makes 5$ per hour. If we let [tex]h[/tex] be the number of ours worked, the rate per our of Jose will be [tex]5h[/tex]. We also know that his pay also includes two season tickets worth a total of $80, so his total income will be given by the expression [tex]l=5h+80[/tex].
We can conclude that the equation that shows Jose's total income after working [tex]h[/tex] hours is: [tex]l=5h+80[/tex]
b. We know that the total income after [tex]h[/tex] hours is given by the right hand side of our equation: [tex]5h+80[/tex]. Now, to set up our inequality we are going to set that right
hand side less than $260:
[tex]5h+80\ \textless \ 260[/tex]
To determine the number of hours he should work, we just need to solve for [tex]h[/tex]:
[tex]5h+80\ \textless \ 260[/tex]
[tex]5h\ \textless \ 180[/tex]
[tex]h\ \textless \ \frac{180}{5} [/tex]
[tex]h\ \textless \ 36[/tex]
We can conclude that Jose needs to work less than 36 hours to make less than $260.
c. Just like before, we know form our problem that Charlie makes 6$ per hour; letting [tex]h[/tex] be the number of worked hours, we get that Charlie's hourly rate is [tex]6h[/tex]. Since we are assuming that he is working at least 20 games, he is going to get the $50 bonus, so his total income woll be given by the expression: [tex]l=6h+50[/tex]
We can conclude that the equation that describes Charlie's total income is [tex]l=6h+50[/tex].
d. We know form our problem that after working at least 20 games Charlie's total income is grater to Jose's income. We also know from our previous calculation that Charlie's total income is [tex]l=6h+50[/tex] and Jose's total income is [tex]l=5h+80[/tex]. Since Charlies total income is greater than Jose's total income, we should set the right hand side of Charlie's equation greater than the right hand side of Jose's equation to reflect that fact:
[tex]6h+50\ \textgreater \ 5h+80[/tex]
To find the number of hours we just need to solve for [tex]h[/tex]:
[tex]6h+50\ \textgreater \ 5h+80[/tex]
[tex]6h-5h\ \textgreater \ 80-50[/tex]
[tex]h\ \textgreater \ 30[/tex]
We can conclude that they need to work more than 30 hours for Charlie to make more money than Jose.
We can conclude that the equation that shows Jose's total income after working [tex]h[/tex] hours is: [tex]l=5h+80[/tex]
b. We know that the total income after [tex]h[/tex] hours is given by the right hand side of our equation: [tex]5h+80[/tex]. Now, to set up our inequality we are going to set that right
hand side less than $260:
[tex]5h+80\ \textless \ 260[/tex]
To determine the number of hours he should work, we just need to solve for [tex]h[/tex]:
[tex]5h+80\ \textless \ 260[/tex]
[tex]5h\ \textless \ 180[/tex]
[tex]h\ \textless \ \frac{180}{5} [/tex]
[tex]h\ \textless \ 36[/tex]
We can conclude that Jose needs to work less than 36 hours to make less than $260.
c. Just like before, we know form our problem that Charlie makes 6$ per hour; letting [tex]h[/tex] be the number of worked hours, we get that Charlie's hourly rate is [tex]6h[/tex]. Since we are assuming that he is working at least 20 games, he is going to get the $50 bonus, so his total income woll be given by the expression: [tex]l=6h+50[/tex]
We can conclude that the equation that describes Charlie's total income is [tex]l=6h+50[/tex].
d. We know form our problem that after working at least 20 games Charlie's total income is grater to Jose's income. We also know from our previous calculation that Charlie's total income is [tex]l=6h+50[/tex] and Jose's total income is [tex]l=5h+80[/tex]. Since Charlies total income is greater than Jose's total income, we should set the right hand side of Charlie's equation greater than the right hand side of Jose's equation to reflect that fact:
[tex]6h+50\ \textgreater \ 5h+80[/tex]
To find the number of hours we just need to solve for [tex]h[/tex]:
[tex]6h+50\ \textgreater \ 5h+80[/tex]
[tex]6h-5h\ \textgreater \ 80-50[/tex]
[tex]h\ \textgreater \ 30[/tex]
We can conclude that they need to work more than 30 hours for Charlie to make more money than Jose.