Question

Do you agree with this analysis that united states v. nixon expanded the power of the presidency? why or why not?

Answer 1

I would disagree with the statement "United States vs. Nixon expanded the power of the presidency." In reality, it shrank the power of the president.

In this Supreme Court case, Richard Nixon refused to give up taped conversations he had from the Oval Office. Nixon claimed that this action was protected by the idea of "executive privilege." This meant that because he was president, he had the ability to keep these tapes from going to the courts. However the Supreme Court, in a unanimous vote, stated that the president must give up the tapes. This showed that no person was above the law, including the president. This shows that the presidents are responsible to the courts and do not have special protection in legal cases.

Answer 2

The analysis that "United States vs. Nixon expanded the power of the presidency" cannot be agreed upon, as they rather contracted the power of the presidency.

What was the case of "United States vs. Nixon"?

In the case of "United States vs. Nixon", Richard Nixon refused to give up taped conversations that it was claimed that this action was protected by the objective of "executive privilege."

This meant that President Nixon had more power than the court of Law that as a President can hide the tape from the court.

But then Supreme Court, through a voting system stated that the president must give up the tapes. This showed that no person was above the law, including the president.

Thus, this shows that the Presidents are accountable for their actions in the court of law and do not have special protection in the case  "United States vs. Nixon".

to learn more about  "United States vs. Nixon", refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/502915